Author Archives: Bill Tucker

About Bill Tucker

Unknown's avatar
Jersey based and New York bred, Bill Tucker is an author of film reviews, short fiction and articles for variety of sites and subjects. He currently blogs for The Austinot (Austin lifestyle), the Entertainment Weekly Blogging Community (TV and film) and SkirmishFrogs.com (retro gaming). He's also contributed articles to Texas Highways magazine. His favorite pastimes include craft beer snobbery, gaming and annoying his friends with random quotes from The King of Comedy. You can check out all of his literary naughty bits at www.thesurrealityproject.com

Machete (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 9/20/2010

Summer 2010 may go down in the ledgers of history as the Year of the Disappointment. Comedies didn?t make people laugh, rom-coms annoyed audiences to tears and action ficks either offered mild enjoyment (Salt, The Losers) or flat out made fans cringe (The Expendables). Even the biggest film of the season, Inception, met with some criticism from critics and fell short of that brilliant category it was all hyped up to be. Only one widely released film, Toy Story 3, has lived up to its expectations; the rest have largely been let downs, regardless of how low or how high those expectations might have been. Luckily, the latest film by grindhouse master Robert Rodriguez finally does just that. Gory yet hammy, violent yet silly, Machete delivers everything that small trailer in Grindhouse promised and is one of the best action movies to come out this year.

Starring the ugliest man in Hollywood, Danny Trejo, Machete is the tale of a Mexican federale who, after witnessing the brutal slaying of his family, has resigned himself to a life of day laboring in Texas. However, after beating a man senseless one handedly (the other hand is holding a soft taco), he is recruited by a high powered executive to assassinate a controversial senator, played wonderfully by Robert DeNiro. This sets in motion a whole slew of exciting action scenes as well a nicely drawn story of immigration and its effect on hard working people. While the story is largely unimportant, it does give the movie a root in something real as opposed to the standard ?army / spy / commando? fare we?ve been seeing this summer.

For the most part, the cast is spot on featuring fine performances by pretty much everyone. From Jessica Alba as a sexy immigration officer to Michelle Rodriguez as a taco stand owner / underground revolutionary to even Cheech Marin as a shotgun toting man of the cloth, most of the cast plays their parts in a very shallow but always entertaining way. With performances that are admittedly campy and over the top, the film is written with sly winks all around, making them appear more homage than cornball. Only Lindsay Lohan disappoints as the executive?s prostituting, drug addled daughter. While the part hits almost too close to reality, the fact of the matter is she can?t pull it off and the character really has no bearing on the story except for obvious shock value.

Although many people have been labeling Machete as the Mexican Expendables, nothing could be further from the truth. Where the Expendables was ham handedly written and directed, Robert Rodriguez realizes that even the silliest of action films need to have someone skillful behind the camera and that talent is evident in spades. Not only does Rodriguez create a wonderful homage to the 70?s style grindhouse flicks he grew up with, he peppers the film with his own brand of winking, offbeat comedy. This gives the film a desperately needed shot of style and self awareness, something that was completely missing in that other summer action blockbuster.

Knowing it?s a complete guilty pleasure and embracing every moment of it, Machete is a pulpy, gory and completely enjoyable good time. While not prestige cinema by any means, Machete is, quite simply, one of the best times you?ll have in mainstream cinema this summer. Ever since El Mariachi, Robert Rodriguez has done great things with very little, mainly because he knows exactly who he is as a person and director. This self awareness penetrates almost everything he does and continues with this, one of his best films to date. While the movie isn?t perfect, the spirit of the picture is. Outlandish and brash yet smarter than expected, Machete is a great summer thrill ride that will have you laughing almost as much it will have you gasping. A confidently and competently made piece of summertime candy, Machete pushes the boundaries yet leaves everyone who sees it yearning for more

Score – 90%


Restrepo (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 9/16/2010

If the video game series Call of Duty has taught me anything, it?s that I would be a terrible soldier. Let?s just say, if I were in Saving Private Ryan, I?d be the dude getting blown away as soon as the doors opened on the Army ATV. Combat is definitely not for me and God bless anybody who engages in it for a living. Restrepo, a chronicle of one year in the lives of a platoon of US soldiers stationed in the most dangerous part of Afghanistan, did nothing to quell my fears. The film, bravely and empathetically done by Tim Hetherington and Sebastian Junger, is an intensely emotional documentary that not only puts you right in the middle of the fray but also places you deep into the psyches of the brave men who have to live with gunfire every single day.

Filmed over the course of one squadron?s tour of duty, Restrepo makes fictional war films seem almost boastful. The firefights are heart stopping in how close they get the viewer to the action; bullet casings bounce off the camera lens, dirt kicks up all around and there is a general sense of controlled confusion amongst the crew that?s honest and interesting. The film also does a fine job of getting us inside the heads of the soldiers engaged in these battles. Filmed after their tour of duty is completed, the uncensored accounts of these GIs really bring you inside the mental strain and anguish that comes with living in constant fear for your life. Filmed with no commentary aside from the accounts of the soldiers and the day to day dialogue of army life, Restrepo is one of the best documentaries of the year and should get a slam dunk Oscar nomination come February. Gritty, unyielding and brilliantly emotional, Restrepo forgoes all window dressing, be it in the filmmaking, the storytelling or the politics of warfare, and instead focuses on the stories of these brave soldiers with startling results. No matter where you stand politically on our current conflict in Afghanistan, Restrepo will make you put that aside and appreciate the people actually engaged in it.

Score – 100%


Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 9/10/2010

Let’s get one thing straight before I start my review of Scott Pilgrim…there is a small spot in my heart that’s reserved for a few things geeky. Not all things geeky mind you, just a choice collection of subjects that are socially labeled as completely dorky. Video games being one of them, imagine how intrigued I was when the trailers for Scott Pilgrim vs. The World first came out. A Nintendo themed picture involving 1-Ups and Tekken style flying kicks that’s directed by the man who brought us Shaun of the Dead’ The nerd inside of me giggled with delight and my instincts were largely correct. Scott Pilgrim is a well-made and fully engaging story of young love that makes up for any weaknesses in the script by providing loads of cinematic eye candy.

The story kicks off as the trendy yet shy rock geek Scott Pilgrim, bass player for the indie band Sex Bomb-Omb, falls for funky girl extraordinaire Ramona Flowers. Soon after they start canoodling, Ramona informs Scott that if they are to continue their teenage love affair, he must defeat her seven evil exes in stylized video game fashion. This sets in motion a series of Street Fighter style battles against the exes, each with its own distinct style and flare. My main concern coming into the film was how repetitive seven fights would be but I’m happy to report that each engagement is distinctive and visually interesting. Add in a love triangle between Pilgrim, Ramona and a 17 year old Chinese girl named Knives and you have yourself a simple story of self-discovery wrapped in the bright lights of a 90’s era arcade.

As far as the man who plays the Musical Mr. Pilgrim is concerned, most people know that I am not a Michael Cera fan. Lacking acting chops, charisma and overall talent, Cera better pray his teenage quirkiness lasts until he’s about fifty. Unfortunately, Cera does nothing in Scott Pilgrim to increase my fandom, although he does fit the part quite well. While he still demonstrates zero skill in emoting or bringing anything out of the character other than lines, Cera does the bare minimum, which in this case, is enough. On the other hand, Mary Elizabeth Winstead does a fine job as Pilgrim’s love interest. Without her surprisingly good performance, SP would have been all bright lights but with it, the story holds together and keeps audiences engaged enough between the punk rock special effects of the fight scenes.

That, of course, is where Scott Pilgrim really shines as a film. While the coins raining from the skies when an ex is defeated may scream of fan service, you don’t need to get the Mario Brothers reference in Scott’s band name to enjoy the visual wizardry. Director Edgar Wright outdoes himself by peppering in just enough score tallies, 8-bit sound effects and geek-centric references to keep the film visually enjoyable without becoming annoying. This is a well made film in almost every sense but unfortunately, the story does start to tail off in the third act. While the individual ‘boss battles’ are all different in their own way, the underlying theme gets muddled. Wright sometimes gets criticized for making his films twenty minutes too long and the same argument could be made for SP as the crux of the story does gets watered down due to the movie’s length.

Minor quibbles aside, Scott Pilgrim vs the World is a well made visual spectacle, featuring fine performances by everyone not named Cera and a sweet underlying story. Although that story runs a little thin, the spirit of the film does not, giving audiences more than enough reason to hang with it until the end. While having some idea of the word of video games would enhance your enjoyment of this movie, knowing the location of the third Warp Whistle in Mario Bros 3 is luckily not required. What is required is an appreciation for young love, kids making awkward mistakes and a whole heaping helping of comic style butt kicking. Miles better than that other comic book movie that came this year, Scott Pilgrim knows exactly what it from the first frame to the last and while it’s not high cinema, it sure is a whole lot of fun.

Score – 80%


Get Low (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 9/3/2010

Saying Robert Duvall has made himself one heck of a film career could be the understatement of the year. Despite being one of the most celebrated American actors working today, Duvall hasn’t really had many starring roles as of late. With a cameo in Crazy Heart here and few lines in The Road there, Duvall has become one of those actors that you see in a film and say while smiling, “Ahhh…that’s Robert Duvall”. However, not since his Academy Award nominated performance in 1997’s The Apostle has Duvall really showed his stuff as a leading actor and no, Gods and Generals doesn’t count because that film stunk. So, to see Duvall take a stab at an intensely emotional starring role really made me stand up and take notice. Luckily for me, Duvall does not disappoint in Get Low as he puts forth another classic performance, one that should get him a look or two for a Best Actor nomination.

In the film, Duvall plays Felix Bush, a curmudgeonly old hermit who has sequestered himself in his densely wooded farmhouse for over forty years. The year is 1930 and Bush has become quite the folk story for the citizens of the lonely Tennessee town that borders his land. Because of these wild stories, Bush decides to come out of seclusion and with the help of a local funeral director, played by Bill Murray, starts to plan his own funeral. Naturally, there’s a catch: Bush not only wants to attend his own funeral while he’s still alive, he wants to invite everybody in the county that has a story about him and have them tell those tales. What happens next is a touching tale of owning up to the past and confronting ones mortality that cements both Robert Duvall and Bill Murray as acting greats.

Much has been written about Duvall’s performance and all I can say is that the accolades are well deserved. Duvall gives the character of Felix Bush a number of different textures; initially Bush looks to be a miserly old hermit but as the film goes on, you see shades of who he was before the incident that caused him to shy away from the world, especially when he interacts with his old flame, played wonderfully by Sissy Spacek. With Spacek, Bush warms up and projects the charm of an old world gentleman while still maintaining the veneer of grittiness that is the core of the character. While Duvall does err on the side of overacting on occasion, the real triumph of his performance is how connected he is with the events of the film. The story is really about confronting mistakes from the past and Duvall, at the age of 79, brings a sense of personal world weariness to the role that is quite profound. Watching Duvall dig deep into his own fears of mortality and project them on screen is quite moving and makes up for any lapses in his performance.

The rest of the cast is equally superb. Bill Murray, who should also get a look for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar, is brilliant as the town funeral director. Murray has perfected the art or wry comedy and gives the film some humorous flavor while still maintaining a sharp acting performance. Top marks also have to be given to Spacek and Lucas Black as Murray’s protégé in the funeral business. First time director, Aaron Schneider, also deserves credit for maintaining an even tone throughout the film, even though it does play a bit slow in some of the middle sections. Make no mistake, this is a patient movie that plays out almost like a theater production and as a result, has the same magnetic ability to drawn the audience in.

Filled with outstanding performances, solid directing and a final reveal that ties the whole experience together, Get Low is one of the better movies to come out this summer. While the movie does seem to take a while to reach a somewhat predictable conclusion, the quality of acting on display overshadows any missteps in the filmmaking or lapses in the storytelling. A homespun yarn of revelation, self-forgiveness and facing one’s imminent demise, Get Low is a rough jewel in an otherwise bland summer season. There may be more exciting pictures in the cinemas right now, but there are few that features two American icons at the top of their game telling a story that nobody wants to see yet everybody ought to.

Score – 80%


The Expendables (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 8/25/2010

About forty five minutes into Sylvester Stallone’s latest opus to testosterone filled action flicks, the main bad guy of the film, played by Eric Roberts, is wandering through the hovel of the general’s daughter, looking for something. What he’s looking for, the film never explains. When he sees some drawings, one of which the daughter gave to Stallone for reasons the movie never explains, he removes one from the wall and examines it closely. Why he would care about her sketches, as he has no idea she gave one to the very man who’s after him, the film never explains. Upon leaving the building, he confronts the general, brandishes the accursed drawing in his face and bellows, “This is how it STARTS!”

Huh? This is how what starts?

Maybe he’s trying to say that allowing the general’s daughter to cultivate a love of the arts has somehow turned her against her murderous father. Or maybe he’s ruminating on the freedoms the island has lived under and how a more tyrannical rule would help the generals’ and ultimately his cause. Or maybe he just prefers charcoal sketches in favor of colored pencil and is lashing out against this affront to his artistic taste. Guess what. The film never explains, but maybe I can. The aforementioned point in the film is actually the start of something. It’s when the movie stops being a mindless homage to the action stars we grew up with and becomes plain mindless. At that exact point, the film doesn’t jump but soars over the proverbial shark turning something that could have been a lot of fun into something stupid, sophomoric and almost painful to watch. The result is a one of the bigger disappointments of the summer.

The ham-handed and awfully penned story is the standard ‘group of ex-CIA soldiers gets hired to take down a dictator fare you’ve seen a hundred times in a hundred different movies. Stallone, along with Jason Statham, Jet Li, Randy Couture and Terry Crews round of out the team but if you’re looking for a big old 80’s reunion, you will be sorely disappointed. In fact, the bulk of the film really revolves around Stallone and Statham, with the rest of the crew merely splitting time and eardrums. While Stallone plays his usual grim self, Statham is the only other cast member who actually looks like he’s trying. The rest of the team badly panders to long established action stereotypes; Li mumbles something about needing money for his family no fewer than four separate times, Crews talks about his weaponry as if they were lovers and Couture talks about going to therapy. Yep, you read right. Therapy and no, it’s nowhere near as funny as they thought it would be. The result is bland, witless banter that serves only as filler between the inevitable fight sequences.

As far as the rest of faces on the movie poster go, they don’t fare much better. The rest of the screen time is split between Dolph Lundgren as ex-member Gunner and Mickey Rourke as Tool, the elder statesman of the group who has retired from mercenary work to become a tattoo artist. While Lundgren is perfectly acceptable as a monstrous ass kicker, Rourke is horribly misused. Given minute after minute of banal monologue, Rourke’s character does nothing but grind the film to a screeching halt. Even Stallone himself looks bored during these drawn out scenes and he wrote the damn thing! The other cameos are simply thrown in as fan service. Bruce Willis overacts his way through the only scene he’s in and Schwarzenegger makes an appearance for exactly thirty seconds. While Stallone and The Governator do share the scene, a moment much ballyhooed by the Comic Con crowd, the result is cheesy and tacked on.

That being said, I cannot blame the actors in this mess, nor can I blame the story. The story is too simplistic to get in the way and the actors are…well…not actors. They’re tough guys with lines. The cardinal sin against this film is in the horrific writing and direction. Note to writer / director Sylvester Stallone: there is a little thing in filmmaking called timing and pacing. This film is a horrid mess of jump cuts, drawn out scenes that go nowhere and timelines so mangled, you would think entire sections of the story were cut out. With a potentially explosive movie like this, the thing should have flown by at breakneck speed but instead stutters, stumbles and jerks its way along like a Ferrari with a stuck transmission and two flat tires. Stallone fails to realize that it actually takes skill and an even hand to create moments of pure violent madness. Blowing people up like an 8th grader with ADD playing Halo just doesn’t do the trick.

Billed as an homage to 80’s action movies, The Expendables does nothing but make audiences wish they were home watching a good 80’s action movie. Going into the film, I told people that I was expecting something along the lines of Commando; a stupid, corny movie that is still a heck of a lot of fun. What I got was a stupid, corny movie that never got better than stupid and corny. Even a few well drawn action scenes, such as the very fun pier explosion scene and Jet Li’s fight with Lundgren, couldn’t save this film from being less than mediocre. In fact, when the much talked about final 40 minutes of constant carnage arrived, I was so thrown off by the badness of the thing, I really couldn’t care less. Besides, after the eightieth explosion and the two hundredth death of a henchman, it all becomes din and white noise anyway.

Promising nothing and delivering less, The Expendables could have been a whole bunch of mindless fun but ends up choppy and incoherent while sporting a story that a third grader could have written. While the film does serve up a healthy dose of visual wizbangs and explosions, the whole experience is too poorly executed to be anything more than a brutal assault on your senses. While I’m fond of saying that action means nothing if you don’t care about the characters involved, I’ll give The Expendables a bit of a pass on that point. Drawn up as mere caricatures of better action stars, the actors in The Expendables really do give it the best they have, which for most of the cast isn’t much. Too bad they couldn’t find a director that spent as much time writing a cohesive story as he did attaching C4 to set pieces and blowing fake soldiers apart with copious amounts of cadmium red. Walking in hoping to get a thrilling ride, I left sporting a splitting headache. At least I got to laugh a little; not with the film, of course, but at it. A film that makes me wish for Mystery Science Theater 3000 to come back on the air, The Expendables is exactly that; a ridiculous and completely avoidable piece of summer blockbuster fluff.

Score – 40%


The Kids Are All Right (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 8/10/2010

Relationships can be exhilarating yet exhausting, infuriating yet nurturing, painful while at the same time poetic. They are life’s ultimate dichotomy. Consisting of hard work and sacrifice that can be a challenge one day and a pleasure the next, relationships transform the people involved from individuals concerned with who they are in favor of the more worldly “who we are”. More than sex, more than money, even more than the need for human connection, a relationship transcends those bounds into something much more meaningful and much more special. If love is insanity, than a relationship is the working practice of that craziness, a symbiotic co-existence that takes two very different people and makes them one, sometimes kicking and screaming along the way.

:::snaps my fingers:::

Hey.  what happened?  You still there?  Think I lost you for a second.

Oh, I get it, you got lost in that long winded paragraph about relationships. Why the tangent? Simple. Every time I tell somebody that I just saw The Kids Are All Right and that it’s one of my favorite movies of year, people always pause and then respond, “Oh! The lesbian movie!

Stop it right there. The Kids Are Alright is a special film that gives you a no- nonsense yet heartfelt look into the trails and passions of modern day relationships with not a trace of schmaltz in the entire movie. Let’s just say that if a movie can make an admittedly embittered critic wax poetically about love, then it has done its job in spades. Kids transcends sexuality and is one of the finest movies about relationships, family and the struggle it takes to keep everything intact I have ever seen and is a lock for my Top 5 of the year.

The story revolves around two lifelong partners, Nic, played by Annette Bening, and Jules played by Julianne Moore. Nic and Jules also have two teenage children, Joni and Laser born from a seemingly anonymous sperm donor. When the kids start getting curious about whom their biological father really is, enter Mark Ruffalo as Paul, their sly talking chef surrogate father. When Paul starts to work his way into the family, the relationship between the usually stoic Nic and the wilder Jules gets strained beyond anybody’s imagination.

Among the many shining aspects of the film, top marks have to be given to writer / director Lisa Cholodenko for crafting one of the best screenplays I’ve seen this year. Full of honest emotion, humor and pathos, the film features one of those scripts that seems effortlessly written. With many of the stories pulled directly from Cholodenko’s own experiences in a same sex relationship, Kids feels like an inadvertent home movie where the camera was left on unintentionally, giving us the lows as well as the highs of this modern day family. Cholodenko also deserves full credit for her delicate touch behind the camera, directing a fine cast of actors and actresses with a sweet sensibility that allows the audience to instantly identify with these richly drawn characters.

Speaking of the acting, Kids features a diverse and well utilized cast, with not a blemish among them. While Moore and Bening play their parts to expected perfection, the real surprises are Mia Wasikowska and Josh Hutcherson as the couple’s teenage children. Much of the integrity of the film rested on their performance and they play their parts naturally, without a single smirk over the circumstances. Mark Ruffalo is the only cast member who plays to type and while it works just fine for this movie, it would be nice to see him branch out from the rough yet slick character he usually plays.

And the gushing could continue on and on and on. From direction to casting, acting to story, even the Vampire Weekend song the film opens with, The Kids Are All Right is a film that deserves the moniker ‘pitch perfect’. The film’s great success not only lies in the way it portrays same sex partnerships but in the way it bridges that gap for everybody to appreciate. Like I mentioned in the opening, this is a film about relationships in general and never once is the sexual orientation of Jules and Nic used as a punch line or a device. These are real people with real love in their hearts and the result is a joy of a movie that is worth seeing over and over again. Maybe I’m being a touch premature, but if I don’t see this movie up for a few Oscars come February, I’m going to be shocked. The Kids Are All Right truly provides a little something for every filmgoer to enjoy and the result is a wonderfully realized film that should be seen as soon as humanly possible.

Score – 100%


Inception (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 7/25/2010

It’s been widely established that Christopher Nolan is a bit of a visionary when it comes to filmmaking. While not quite on the level of Spielberg and Lucas, with films like Momento, Insomnia and 2008’s The Dark Knight, Nolan has proven himself as a director who can satisfy audiences and critics alike. So, in this summer’s wildly hyped and promoted Inception, Nolan has finally made the film he’s always wanted to make, mixing his love for complex storylines and tragically flawed anti-heroes in a film he clearly hopes blows audiences away. The result’ A damn good try that does a lot of little things right but ultimately feels too overcooked for its own good.

Starring Leonardo DeCaprio, Ellen Page and Marion Cotillard, Inception is the story of a team of dream crashers who, after a job gone awry, is given the chance of a lifetime; rather than sneaking around a subjects dream with the intent of extracting secrets, they are tasked with injecting an idea in. The result is wild race against time, mental projections and all sorts of psudeo-science hoopla that provides some decent thrills, a fascinating premise and a story that barely ties together despite the sheer amount of material presented. There is a lot to absorb in Inception and while Nolan does a very good job of keeping the film moving and the audience engaged, he makes some sacrifices in storytelling along the way. Sure, if he hadn’t we would still be sitting there watching it, but the result is a film that has everything that was advertised, just in limited amounts, creating an entertaining but slightly thin experience.

As one could tell from a quick glance at the trailers, most of the emotional heavy lifting is on the shoulders of Leonardo DeCaprio as the team’s lead dream sneaker. While I’m still not sold on DeCaprio’s acting chops, he does a more than adequate job portraying Nolan’s signature emotionally wrought anti-hero. While there are moments where DeCaprio just doesn’t hit the emotional depths required to keep the character engaging, his best scenes are when he’s paired with the always excellent Mario Cotillard as his love interest. At its core, Inception is a cyber sleuth love story and while Leo simply can’t hang with Cotillard on an acting level, Nolan does a great job of developing their relationship, in turn developing their characters.

Unfortunately, the rest of the cast is just there for the room tumbling ride. While there are some notable performances by Tom Hardy as the team’s wisecracking ‘Forger’, Dileep Rao as the ‘chemist’ of the team and Cillian Murphy as the exec who’s the recipient of the implanted idea, the rest of the cast just hangs there, underdeveloped and underused. The worst offender is Ken Watanbe as the mumbling taskmaster who put DeCaprio and team up to the whole thing, who, with the exception of bookending the film, provided nothing to the story. Joseph Gordon-Levitt also does a fine if forgettable job as Leo’s number two man. To me, aside from the wonderful Marion Cotillard, the best character in the film is the spinning token carried by DeCaprio to remind himself he’s in the real world. Let’s just say that the most gripping point of the film involves that inanimate object, a feat that Nolan deserves full credit for and should not be missed.

But you may be saying to yourself, this is a summer action movie! Acting be damned, how’s all that city bending, Matrix style float fighting I’ve been seeing in trailers’ Well, action buffs will get a Tale of Two Cities in Inception; it is the best of times when Ellen Page is warping dream worlds and it’s the worst of times when the film devolves to a rejected James Bond movie in the snow blanketed third act. As a matter of fact, the middle bit of Inception is probably some of the strongest stuff you’ll see all summer, with mind bending feats of wall jumping, gravity defiance and hand to hand combat that sets up a huge let down in the third act. By the time the team gets to the snow drenched mountains of the third part, the action becomes rote, stale and frankly boring. Viewers who are expecting a high velocity action flick get some of what’s promised but not quite what the trailers suggest.

On a side note, many fans and critics have been hailing Inception as this decade’s Matrix and in my opinion it falls short in that comparison. While the stories have some ties of alternate realities and dream worlds, Inception does not emotionally connect in the way the Matrix did and as a result, is an inferior experience. The reason is simple. In the Matrix, the joy of the film was the discovery of this mind blowing ‘real world’ alongside an instantly identifiable main character. No matter what your lot in life is, everyone has felt like ‘Mr. Anderson’ at some point and the thrill of learning about the world of machines with Keanu Reeves made that film the classic it is today. In Inception, DeCaprio and company are old pros, so there is no excitement in the discovery of this new world. Instead of learning alongside an amazed Keanu Reeves, we get lectured along with Ellen Page, who is written as that audience link but fails pretty miserably in that task. Where Reeves spends a whole movie just learning about this new world, it feels like Page has it down pat in exactly five minutes. That, combined with a surprisingly bland performance, is what knocks Inception from excellent down to merely good.

In reviewing my review, it sounds like I’m being overly harsh, when in the end, I had a very good time watching Inception. The problem is that it really could have been so much more. While I rarely make an argument for films to be longer, I truly believe that the intriguing central idea of Inception would have been better served as two movies instead of one; one movie to set up the world and the characters and the second to get into the meat of the action. That way, we could have discovered the dream space of Inception naturally instead of getting it force fed to us in the opening half hour. All that being said, Inception is still the most interesting and thought provoking film you will see in wide release this summer and more than worth a watch, especially in the theater with a good crowd. Director Christopher Nolan has created an dream-centric love story full of spinning hallways, arresting visuals and an eye opening view of the world we inhabit when our eyes are closed. Despite it being a touch watered down, Inception is still pretty close to a must see this summer if only so you can discuss it with likeminded people. Besides, it’s either this or Last Airbender and a choice like that isn’t really a choice at all.

Score – 80%


Toy Story 3 (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 7/4/2010

Being the flagship franchise in the impressive library of Pixar vehicles, Toy Story 3 has a lot of pressure on it. Each film in the series has mirrored the state of the company in some way; the original film from 1995 was the first fully computer animated film ever to be released and Toy Story 2, originally marked to be a 60 minute straight to DVD affair, marked Pixar’s first run in with Disney, prompting a 6 year love/hate relationship with the company. Now, with Toy Story 3, Pixar is the top dog amongst animation companies, Disney now owns the former software developer and with films like Wall-E and Up, Pixar is changing what people expect from computer generated films. With Wall-E and Up, Pixar has finally created films that emotionally connect on a number of levels and Toy Story 3 marks the first time Pixar has done so with an established property, taking the series from simply cute and fun to a level reserved for the best comedic dramas. The result is the best film in the franchise and one the best movies of the year.

The story of Toy Story 3 picks up ten years after the events of Toy Story 2; Andy is getting ready to leave for college and the toys, now relegated to the old toy bin when Andy is around, are trying anything they can to get face time with their owner. The setup is a touch sad and sets the tone for the rest of the film. Not to say the film is a total bummer or anything but the film has a much darker, realistic tone than any of the previous films in the series. While there are moments of pure hilarity, most of the time I found myself connecting emotionally with Buzz and pals; rooting for them when they were in trouble, empathizing when they were ruminating about the passage of time and wanting them to succeed even when the odds were against them. For the first time in the franchise, the toys actually emoted on a human level and the results are astounding.

Of course, heartfelt playthings would be nothing without a good story to support them and Toy Story 3 provides that story in spades. With the introduction of the lovable yet twisted Lotso, voiced wonderfully by Ned Beatty, the film has one of the best adversaries in the series, giving the toys someone to battle against as opposed to someone to run from, avoid or rescue. The subtext of Andy moving to college also gives the film a real sense of loss and uncertainty, something we always figured would happen to Andy’s toys but never thought we’d actually see. Mix that with some fine action, some hilarious sight gags and the sense of exploration that only Toy Story can provide and you have a well crafted tale that will have you talking and thinking for days to come.

The voice acting is as top notch as ever, with Hanks, Allen and the whole crew back for one more run around the playground. The additions of Beatty as the aforementioned Lotso and Bud Luckey as the scene stealing plastic clown, Chuckles, add some flair to the usual cast of characters. The animation is also top of the line, making the original Toy Story look like a student project in comparison. The 3D aspect of the film is, however, hit or miss. While I appreciated the depth and texture the extra field of vision provided, if you’re looking for things to start flying at you, this never happens, so you may want to watch the standard version if you want to save the extra four bucks. Also, some of the gags fall flat and the middle third starts to lag and repeat itself, but the final 20 minutes are so good and so wrenching, you will completely forget any minor quibbles you may have with the film. If you thought the first 10 minutes of Up was good, wait until the end of Toy Story 3. While I wasn’t reaching for the tissues or anything, it put a swell in my heart that’s pretty uncommon in the realm of animated movies.

With a great story, wonderful animation and the downward arc of a group of characters we have loved for fifteen years, Toy Story 3 is a wonderful third (and hopefully final) stanza of a beloved film franchise. Pixar has finally reached the point where they now can create animated films that connect emotionally with audiences in ways only thought possible by conventional cinema and Toy Story 3 is the culmination of that progression. If Toy Story 3 is the final film in the series, then it should be remembered as the beginning of an era, an era where a huge commercial entity showed the world that a sequel doesn’t have to be pointless regurgitation; it can elevate an art form. Sequels have often been thought of in term of diminishing returns, but Toy Story 3 bucks that tradition and provides a sequel that not only trumps the originals but redefines what sequels are supposed be. If Toy Story 3 is any indication of what we can expect in the future from Pixar, we can feel confident that the company will continue to push the filmmaking envelope by providing us new worlds to explore, stories to enjoy and characters to fall in love with.

Score – 100%


Splice (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 6/29/2010

The moral conundrum of life, the source of it and who holds sway over the very fabric of our existence is a long running and controversial discussion. Do human beings have the authority to manipulate DNA or is that a task better left to a higher power and what are the consequences to that meddling? These high minded questions, among a host of others, are examined in grisly detail in Vincenzo Natali’s latest film, Splice, a movie that’s one part horror, part mediation on modern relationships and still another part cautionary tale. There’s a ton going on in this film, way more than a simple trailer can convey and that saves the film from getting too wrapped up in its desire to be three different films at once.

The main story centers on two genetic engineers, played by Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley, who after creating a successful pair genetic hybrid animals, decide to try to add human DNA to the creation. Most likely, you’ve already seen the end result of their efforts in the various trailers that have been circulating online and on TV, but do not let that stop you from seeing this movie. The film tracks the entire lifecycle of this creation and each iteration is visually interesting enough to where the trailer spoiler isn’t really spoiling anything at all. As a matter of fact, the trailer does the film a bit a disservice in painting the movie as a standard creature feature, when it fact, it’s much more complex and original than the advertisements make it out to be.

While the central narrative centers on the growth of the human / animal hybrid, there are a number of sub plots that elevate the movie beyond a standard “spook you out of your seats” summer flick. The struggles of modern relationships, the influence of corporate America on scientific advancements and the morality behind genetic manipulation all help move an excellently written screenplay along without the jumble and mess a story like this could bring to a film. Although the film starts to loose its way in the third act, the story as whole is about as well written as one would expect from a thus far bland summer season.

The film also works thanks to some terrific acting by both Brody and Polley, who perfectly play the conflicted scientist couple. The two have an endearing on screen chemistry that works both in intimate situations and when things get a touch grittier. Natal also does a nice job in direction, allowing for some truly shocking moments as well as quieter moments within this creepshow of a film. Although the final third of the film takes some pretty daring twists and turns, Natali keep the film focused enough to bring the whole affair to a satisfying conclusion.

Splice is one of those films that attempts to be everything all once and for the most part pulls it off. Even though the final half hour may leave some viewers bewildered, unsettled and a little grossed out, there is an intriguing web of subtext in this film that can be overlooked by the unobservant and enriches the movie for those who catch it. Featuring excellent performances, an intriguing storyline and an ending twist that, while telegraphed an hour beforehand, still gets one’s heart racing, Splice is a bright spot on this so far dull summer season. Films like this do not get released wide very often and even though it has some bumps and bruises, Splice is an excellent film for those who need more than Adam Sandler or action rom coms from their summer movie-going experiences.

Score – 80%


Micmacs (Micmacs à tire-larigot) (2010)

Originally Reviewed – 6/23/2010

Director Jean-Pierre Jeunet is one of those filmmakers that everybody knows yet nobody’s heard about. With a career that started with the critically acclaimed black comedy Delicatessen and peaked with the fan favorite Amelie, Jenunet is known for mixing striking visuals and dark comedy with a deeply human element. While his latest feature, Micmacs, doesn’t have the texture of Amelie or the morbidity of Delicatessen, the film re-stamps Jeunet as a virtuoso behind the camera. Packed with imagination, beauty and a frantic, infectious energy that I haven’t seen since the aforementioned Amelie, Micmacs marks a return to form, especially for fans who fell in love with 2001’s quirky French brunette.

The main arc of Micmacs is a fairly straightforward story of salt of the earth pranksters instigating a war between two competing weapons manufacturers. The main character, played by Dany Boon, catches a stray bullet right to the cranium that, now lodged deep in his skull, can kill him at any moment. But rather than go through life cautiously avoiding head trauma, he enlists a team of scrap scavengers to help him bring down the corporations that made his imminent demise possible. What follows next is a series of ingeniously inventive traps, schemes and ploys that feed the fires between the two rivals, with often explosive results.

As you can tell from the synopsis, the screenplay is fairly by the numbers, as is the character development. With the exception of Boon and his contortionist love interest, the rest of the team suffers from lack of screen time and proper development. The same could be said for the war mongering antagonists as they play the standard bad guy archetype you’ve seen a hundred times. To be honest, I barely remembered the lead characters name, never mind the names of his cohorts. Also, the ending (not the surprise at the end, but the eventual result) was crystal clear a half hour in. While this may seem a recipe for failure, Micmacs only benefits from these omissions; anything more detailed, more complex or more cerebral and the spirit of the film would have been totally lost.

This is not a complex film by any stretch of the imagination, but the simplicity in character development and storyline gives way to a visual treat that more than makes up for the threadbare plot. Jeunet re-establishes himself as a wizard behind the camera with a depth of imagination that is almost breathtaking. Billed as a satirical tale about the dangers of the weapons industry, Micmacs eschews subtlety for explosions, trickery and a grand final set-piece that even had me fooled for a bit. From the contortionist flexing her way out of trouble to the charming creations of the elderly inventor to the harebrained schemes these crusaders concoct, it all has a wild joy about it that shrouds any flaws in the narrative

Micmacs knows what it is from the first frame and never pretends to be anything more than a stunning visual guilty pleasure, with a deeper meaning you can either absorb or leave at the door. The film has a whimsical, fairy tale quality to it that is joyful and infectious. Like anything overly saccharine, you may or may not have the taste for it, but like a five year old on a candy binge, I nearly went into diabetic shock during this film while loving every minute of it. Micmacs plays like a wild Saturday morning cartoon with a visionary director pulling the strings and the result is memorable. It’s not the deepest of film going experiences, but you’ll be hard pressed to find a more enjoyable lighthearted farce in the cinemas this summer.

Score – 85%